3.6.4 Extending life
of the mountain bike
Although the Pioneer range was intended as an MTB replacement, it
was recognised that it was not a perfect substitute, its market
being somewhat different. There was therefore a need to extend the
product life of the MTB, especially for younger customers. In the
USA, interest had been growing in suspension for mountain bikes.
Alex Moulton’s dual suspension 20" wheel ATB, launched
in the USA in 1988, was probably the first fully suspended production
mountain bike. Although far from the mainstream of mountain bike
design, it stimulated interest in the subject and Rockshox telescopic
front forks reached the UK in 1990.
Adding suspension to a Raleigh MTB seemed a good way of boosting
interest and sales, hence the very successful Activator was created.
This was a budget MTB with a simple Raleigh-designed telescopic
front fork. Launched in 1992, it was advertised effectively on TV.
The following year saw the introduction of Activator II, a dual
suspension version, with a Raleigh-designed rear suspension system
somewhat reminiscent of that used on the Raleigh-manufactured Moulton
MkIII. Activator II launched at £260 (= about £315 today)
and by May 1994 could be bought at discount for £200.
Whereas the Activators were essentially budget MTBs with inexpensive
suspension designed in-house, Raleigh recognised that the other
end of the mountain bike market needing nurturing. Yvonne Rix understood
how Ford effectively used sub-brands such as Cosworth to create
interest and capture customers with aspirations higher than Dad’s
much-loved but mundane Mondeo. Hence the Raleigh sub-brand M-Trax
was developed, offering high quality MTBs. Both in marketing and
product development, M-Trax benefited from the successes of the
Raleigh Mountain Bike team, which Rix instigated in 1989.
At the MTB entry level further development was needed to sustain
interest and market share. Yvonne Rix had recognised the sales potential
of MTBs with oversize aluminium tubing, which some competitors were
introducing. However, Raleigh had no in-house aluminium frame-building
facilities and did not want to buy in frames. At the Harrogate cycle
show in 1993, Rix concluded that the appeal of oversize tubes to
younger customers was primarily visual. They liked the look but
were not particularly interested in the material used. Raleigh was
able to handle wider but thinner-walled steel tubes and hence the
Max range was born. Launched in 1995, the bikes were advertised
on TV as ‘oversized but not overweight’. The range was
hugely successful for some four years.
3.6.5
Electrically assisted bicycles
In 1998, Yvonne Rix retired as marketing director. The last innovation
she introduced was the Select electric bike, which was launched
in 1997. The Select had a proportional power control system that
automatically monitored and matched the rider’s energy input,
switching-in electric assistance only when required. It sold for
about £1,000. Rix believes firmly that electrically assisted
cycles have a big future, subject to battery improvements commensurate
with those seen in the development of mobile telephones.
Raleigh was the first major UK manufacturer to offer an electric
bike. Unfortunately, it was too early and too expensive to have
much impact on sales, and was dropped by Rix’s successor.
3.6.6
Sturmey-Archer
For a long time, Raleigh supported Sturmey-Archer by fitting an
AW 3-speed hub in the entry-level model of each range. There was,
however, an image problem with the product and a 5-speed derailleur
was a cheaper, more fashionable alternative. Moreover, Raleigh sometimes
paid more for S-A products than did competitors, which lead to internal
friction. Today S-A and Raleigh are relatively independent. There
is no special favouring by Raleigh of S-A products. A Raleigh is
as likely to have a Shimano 7-speed hub from the other side of the
world, as it is a Sturmey-Archer from the other side of the road.
Under Derby, Sturmey-Archer was able to re-engineer many of its
hubs. In most cases, this was successful, apart from the short lived
and unsatisfactory 5 StAr dual-cable 5-speed hub. A single-cable
5-speed hub, the Sprinter 5, replaced this. During the 1990s, more
than 20 years after patenting a 7-speed hub, S-A was finally allowed
to bring one to market, the Sprinter 7. Sadly, this was only after
its main rivals, Sachs (now Spectro by SRAM) and Shimano had already
introduced 7-speed hubs.
Sturmey-Archer’s main market is the Netherlands. The major
British specifiers are makers of portable cycles, such as Brompton,
and niche players such as Pashley, for their roadsters, folders
and delivery cycles, including those used by the Royal Mail.
3.6.7
1998 and after
Yvonne Rix retired in 1998. Her successor appointed a new advertising
agency and instigated a change of corporate image. Sales had been
falling at about 8% per annum for the previous two years but in
1998 they plunged 29% to 405,000, the lowest since 1970. Market
share was down from 21 to 15%, probably the lowest in a hundred
years.
At the time of writing, figures for 1999 were not available but
early indications suggested a recovery to approximately 1997 levels.
3.7
High end products: 1975-99
3.7.1 Carlton
Production of high end cycles at Nottingham ended in the late 1950s
with the Reg Harris era. Awareness of, and interest in, the demands
of the serious competitive cyclist died with it. The acquisition
in 1960 of Kevin and Gerald O’Donovan’s Carlton Cycles
generally filled this gap. However, as Carlton was for the most
part run autonomously, the association of the Raleigh brand with
performance products ceased in the UK.
The export situation was very different. Raleigh products designed
and built by Carlton were an important part of the range. They sold
well in their own right and were not used just to lend credibility
to the rest of the range.
3.7.2
Lightweights move to Nottingham
The success of Carlton was seen as diluting the Raleigh brand and
therefore the Carlton brand was killed off. Production was transferred
to a new lightweight department at Nottingham. Initially the products
were lacklustre: high specification tubing but with mass production
geometry and mid-range equipment. There was relatively little contact
with potential customers: this, coupled with Raleigh’s inherent
lack of responsiveness, led to some delay before the product met
the intended customers’ needs.
Although Raleigh had a successful racing team on the Continent,
marketing made little use of this to promote Nottingham-built bikes.
Meanwhile, serious cyclists turned their backs on the Nottingham
lightweights and beat a path to buy frame-sets from the Raleigh
team workshop, Gerald O'Donovan’s Specialist Bicycles Development
Unit at Ilkeston.
Nonetheless, the Nottingham-made product did improve and the International
Cycling Guide 1983 selected the off the peg Raleigh Team Replica
as one of its bikes of the year. Campagnolo-equipped, it sold for
£450 (= about £880 today).
3.7.3
Special Products Division
The demise of the European team in the early 1980s led to the closure
of Ilkeston but resulted in Gerald O’Donovan and Melvyn Cresswell
teaming up on product development at what became known as Special
Products Division. Shortly before this, and supported by his ‘indulgent
boss’ Yvonne Rix, Cresswell had designed and launched the Randonneur
tourer. It was based on personal experience and inspired by his
first ‘serious’ bicycle, which Gerald O’Donovan had
built for him many years previously. Although Raleigh’s most
expensive complete bicycle, it was an instant success. The Randonneur
proved that Raleigh could still sell high-end product if it was
thoughtfully designed and manufactured.
The small team gathered together at Special Products built on this
success. They produced many viable new bikes, which initially sold
in good volumes. Derby encouraged this development work and Ed Gottesman,
leader of the Derby buy-out, was particularly supportive. An avid
collector of high-end Raleighs, he was always looking to add to
his collection. Moreover, he always paid for his Special Products
bikes.
Managing director Sandy Roberts was also a keen supporter of the
unit. However, after he retired in 1990, support waned. Despite
pioneering work on thermal bonding technology (DynaTech) and frame
manufacture using titanium and metal matrix composites, the Raleigh
board was unsure how to make use of Special Products Department.
Should it be required to make a profit? Should it be a development
overhead? Was it a marketing tool and hence part of marketing costs?
Yet, even breaking even was difficult. This was the era when internal
transfer charging became fashionable in the corporate world. Despite
being autonomous, Special Products had to contribute disproportionately
to corporate IT costs, human resources department costs and even
the running of directors’ cars. Meanwhile the sales department
had little interest in Special Products and was so tied to the Raleigh
5-star dealer network that access was denied to quality independent
dealers capable of selling the product. The decline of Special Products
was therefore inevitable, although the unit still exists.
3.7.4
Special Products as niche support for volume production
The Raleigh view is that the company always has been and remains
primarily about mass-production. The brand philosophy also dictates
that Raleigh must make the best end of the bicycles sold in volume.
Therefore, if Raleigh sells mountain bikes, it must make the top
niche Raleigh MTBs. Consequently, Special Products development unit
now makes MTBs for the Raleigh team, whose mission is ‘to demonstrate
that Raleigh make the best mountain bikes in the world’. This
is not particularly profitable in its own right, but is worthwhile
because of the brand enhancement when selling ordinary bicycles.
Moreover, there is a trickle down of technological development and
refinement from the team machines to ordinary production.
The philosophy today regarding Special Products is that any niche
markets catered for must relate to the mass-produced products.
"Prices from £2000 to £270": niche products
in support of the mass market.
.............................................
|